A key obstacle to Alex Salmond appearing before the inquiry into the handling of harassment complaints against him may have been removed.
MSPs on Holyrood’s management group have agreed that a controversial submission to the inquiry by the former first minister can be published.
The submission accuses his successor, Nicola Sturgeon, of misleading parliament.
Mr Salmond had said he would not appear at the inquiry unless it was published.
The inquiry committee had previously refused to do so, citing legal concerns.
But the Scottish Parliament’s corporate body ruled on Thursday afternoon that “on balance it is possible” to publish the submission.
The move could see Mr Salmond give evidence to MSPs on Wednesday of next week.
Ms Sturgeon would then appear the following week, with the first minister previously saying she was “relishing” the prospect of putting her side across and rebutting “conspiracy theories” about her.
The Holyrood inquiry was set up to investigate what went wrong with the government’s internal investigation of harassment complaints against Mr Salmond, after he successfully took them to court.
The former SNP leader has also raised questions about Ms Sturgeon’s role in the process, claiming she had “repeatedly” misled parliament about when she learned about the complaints and had therefore broken the ministerial code.
Mr Salmond said he would only face the Holyrood inquiry if the submission making these claims – which has been widely publicised – was formally published by the committee, so he could refer to it in his oral evidence.
However members twice voted along party lines to reject this, meaning a planned evidence session with Mr Salmond had to be called off earlier this month.
After the second vote, the committee agreed to refer the matter to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, a group of MSPs responsible for the running of Holyrood.
And that group has now agreed that “on balance it would be possible to publish the submission by Alex Salmond on the ministerial code” – although they said it would have to be processed in line with the committee’s evidence-handling rules, which may mean parts are redacted.
This could open the door to Mr Salmond giving evidence after all, with the former first minister having “cleared his diary” for a session on 24 February.
Ms Sturgeon has repeatedly rejected accusations of wrongdoing, saying: “I do not consider that I breached the ministerial code – I will make that case very, very robustly”.
The first minister also said she wanted to “take head on some of the ridiculous conspiracy theories” circulating about her involvement.